And so it begins (pt. 2)

Ladies and gentlemen – the press elected Obama:

The Post provided a lot of good campaign coverage, but readers have been consistently critical of the lack of probing issues coverage and what they saw as a tilt toward Democrat Barack Obama. My surveys, which ended on Election Day, show that they are right on both counts.

I’m not sure what this part has to do with anything:

The op-ed page ran far more laudatory opinion pieces on Obama, 32, than on Sen. John McCain, 13. There were far more negative pieces about McCain, 58, than there were about Obama, 32, and Obama got the editorial board’s endorsement. The Post has several conservative columnists, but not all were gung-ho about McCain.

Being that the purpose of the “opinion” page is to express opinion. Not provide some sort of “balance” – whatever that means – by balancing the number of times they criticize candidates. I know that I only worked for a college newspaper – and rather poorly at that – but as I understand at it the opinion pages is where writers are supposed voice they take on issues, ideally it is the part of the paper where those – supposed – journalistic “ideals” of “objectivity” and “balance” don’t have to hold.

Again, I could be wrong – I don’t work for the Washington Post.

SEE ALSO: The incredibly frustrating profile on the campaign for a full throated articulation of the “press elected Obama” meme.


One Comment on “And so it begins (pt. 2)”

  1. puttysauce says:

    ah, yes. when i was breaking down individual issues on my blog in the run-up to the election, i received some interesting (read: hilarious) comments about the media being in the sack for Obama. they pointed to a very credible (read: laughable) study about how Obama uses hypnosis, and then cried about the media bias.

    my response: “i’m not sure if this is because Obama simply has better ideas and presents them more effectively, or because the media is being hypnotized.”

    OF COURSE a candidate with steady, thoughtful ideas and eloquent presentation of those ideas is going to garner more positive attention than someone with constantly changing, mediocre (at best) ideas presented stiffly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s